From The Living Church-
You may not understand what
happened at the Episcopal Church’s recent General Convention in Austin,
but you probably know that it was big news. Stories on liturgical
revision ran in Washington Post, Juicy Ecumenism, CBN, Religion News Service, GetReligion, and First Things, among others, plus many articles at Episcopal News Service and The Living Church.
An article in the Washington Post seemed to get the facts wrong: “The Episcopal Church will revise its beloved prayer book but doesn’t know when.” But the Post was following the headline of Episcopal News Service (ENS), which declared, “Deputies agree with bishops on new plan for liturgical and prayer book revision.” On the same day, The Living Church — which also publishes Covenant — led with a nearly contradictory headline: “Changing Trains on Liturgical Revision” (TLC’s earlier article was even more stark: “Bishops Kill BCP Revision”).
It turns out that when you move past the headlines, most of these
articles acknowledge the basic facts. The difference comes in the angle.
As Matthew Townsend of TLC summarizes things in “Changing Trains”:
“Both houses of General Convention have approved a resolution that will
move the Episcopal Church closer to liturgical revision, but not closer
to a revised Book of Common Prayer.”
More here-
https://livingchurch.org/covenant/2018/08/24/did-general-convention-authorize-prayer-book-revision/
Opinion – 21 December 2024
21 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment